/ / / / / / / / / /

The TSA May Be Getting Overconfident About Those 'Gingerbread Man' Scanners

August 17, 2011 at 2:09 PM | by | Comments (2)

TSA spokesman James Fotenos has emailed us a clarification about this story. Check the bottom of this post for the update, including an answer on what you can expect from TSA's Gingerbread Man scanner policies!

It's kind of a big day for Ohio travelers, as three of the state's airports got the new Gingerbread Man full-body scanners that TSA has been rolling out. Officials at CLE, TOL, and DAY have started routing flyers toward the new and very much working machines, which provide all the security of the old scanners without the backlash-inducing nudey picture overtones.

Further east, RDU is supposed to be getting the new scanners in the coming days, and of course we covered the installations in BWI and TPA in the political/technical backgrounder we did last week (you can read it here).

TSA officials are talking as if the new machines will resolve the concerns that everyone has with full-body scanners. We're not so sure.

There are plenty of people who avoid the machines because they don't trust the government and their incompetent safety subcontracters on radiation safety issues. It's also understandable—if medically incorrect—for cancer and immunocompromised patients to have concerns. Then there's the contingent of travelers who don't like having to strike the not-exactly-not-humiliating "hands above your head like you're a criminal" pose. The new machines do nothing for them and—judging by the comments we get every time we do a full-body scanner post—there are more than a few of those people out there.

Ongoing concerns shouldn't really count as arguments against the new Gingerbread Man scanners, as long as travelers will still be allowed to opt out. Theoretically the new scanners should alleviate the concerns of some travelers without angering anyone who wasn't already concerned about the more invasive scanners. All win and no lose.

But listen very closely to the interview with Michael Young, TSA's Federal Security Director in Northern Ohio, which we've embedded below. Skip to 1:15 where he says "During this pilot it's very important to understand that these are 100% voluntary. No one will be required to use these - at this time. It's an evolutionary process..."

Now that could mean that right now passengers have a choice between the usual full-body scanners, Gingerbread Man scanners, or pat-downs, and that later the choice will only be between Gingerbread Man scanners and pat-downs. Or it could mean that TSA is gearing up to declare that, with the deployment of less invasive scanners, flyers no longer have any reasonable reason to opt out. We're 50/50 on which we would prefer. Mandatory scanning for everyone!

As travelers we obviously prefer to have as many options as possible, and we're also not wild about some of the more extreme hysteria in public criticism of TSA, which would reach new heights in the absence of opt-out options. But as bloggers...can you imagine the easy content?

UPDATE: TSA spokesperson James Fotenos writes in:

Just wanted to point out that the Plain Dealer video you’re using and quoted in the piece is from 2009. That year, TSA conducted a limited pilot of both backscatter and millimeter wave technology at Cleveland Hopkins. In 2011, we only use millimeter wave at that location, and it is no longer in the pilot phase... advanced imaging technology, including those using the ATR upgrade, is optional for all passengers.

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

Scanners vs Pat-Downs

Even with the old Nude-O-Scopes, the passenger ALWAYS had the right to decline the scan and go through a thorough (emphasize THOROUGH) pat-down. When the modified Nekkid Gingerbread PERSON scanners are set up, passengers will still have the right to request the thorough pat-down. And I find it somewhat amusing that everyone's touting this a "TSA's new scanners", when the EXACT same Gingerbread scanners have been in use at Amsterdam, The Netherlands for AT LEAST two years. More likely, the software was more expensive and our cheap "low bidder wins" mentality had them using the Nude-O-Scopes in the sectioned-off plywood booths and walkie-talkies.

Kill TSA - Save 9 Billion per year!

The fact is: The TSA is unnecessary. The entire security theatre is not needed. The TSA is here because too many scared people demand its atrocities in the name of "safety."

How "safe" are you, really? These vermin scour through your private belongings and steal. These perverts look at your bodies and then touch you where you do not like.

If they were kindergarten teachers they would be arrested for the same things.

The entire "war on terror" is all by design. Look at reality. You can go to the theatre, the mall, a basketball game, walk down the street, enter most private buildings, go into jewelry stores and banks. One can access 99.9999% of the places on earth without EVER having to be groped and scanned and yet, where are all those "terror attacks?"

A "real terrorist" would have a field day at many of the places mentioned. If their goal is fear and damage, one or two suitcases on a Saturday at the local shopping mall would be more "effective."

So, those of you who do not have a problem with the scanners and groping, why not demand your local supermarket install those devices because you never know, that person with the cart of groceries may be a suicide bomber.

Join the conversation!

Not a member? .