/ / /

Is BP Oil Spill Panic Needlessly Destroying Tourism?

June 8, 2010 at 3:38 PM | by | Comments (0)

Alongside all the other confusion being caused by the BP oil spill, now we've got Gulf states fighting over how bad it actually is. The objective news on the disaster is muddled enough. BP claims to be making progress in capturing oil, and that cleanup is progressing. But environmental officials are talking about plumes deep underwater that could be destroying the environment indefinitely. And now different governors and tourism boards are arguing over whether media coverage has been overblown.

On one side you've got Republican Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour going nuclear on the media, blaming them for triggering a tourism-destroying panic. He insisted on Fox News Sunday that, at least as far as his state is concerned, there have only been two incidents of oil washing ashore. Money line from that interview: "tar balls are no big deal." That would mesh with the interviews that Texas officials have been giving, where they're flat out denying that oil-covered birds are washing ashore in their states. We don't know whether to believe them or not, but, ummm...

Florida, meanwhile, is on the exact other side of the debate. They're so distraught that they're changing their entire approach to tourism advertising. Florida's tourism board has dropped their "Coast Is Clear" campaign, apparently because they noticed that their coast is anything but clear. This is annoying to us on a number of levels, most of them having to do with how they just spent weeks screaming about how everyone was lying and about how their beaches weren't going to be affected. They couldn't have maybe seen this coming ahead of time?

We should probably also note that untangling all these politicians' motives isn't straightforward. You could say that Gulf states like Mississippi and Texas have an incentive to minimize the damage, because they want tourists to come to their states and because they benefit economically from oil drilling. Or you could say that they have incentives to inflate the damage, because they want disaster relief and because they'd like to make a Democratic White House look incompetent.

And you could discount Florida entirely, given how sleazy they've been over-hyping the spill's impacts from the beginning. Or you could say that they went all-in on "clean beaches," so if they're giving it up it's because they have to.

So yeah, we don't know.

[Photo: International Bird Rescue Research Center / Wiki Commons]

Related Stories:
· Haley Barbour: Oil? What Oil? Press Should Stop Scaring Tourists [Stein]
· Travel News [Jaunted]
· Travel Alerts [Jaunted]

Comments (0)

Post a Comment

Join the conversation!

Not a member? .