Close User Name Password
Travel alerts straight to your inbox:
 

Tags: / / / /

California Can't Pay For Its Parks, Meaning You Can't Visit Them

June 8, 2009 at 2:17 PM | by Omri | 0 Comments

Were you planning on some recession vacationing this summer in California's vast network of state parks? Too bad:

Desperate for revenues, Schwarzenegger has taken the unprecedented step of proposing the closure of 220 of the 279 state parks and beaches – from Lake Tahoe's Emerald Bay to the deserts of Anza-Borrego – to save about $213 million over the next two years. Administration officials said the list of targets came down to which parks generate more revenues from fees and concessions than they cost to operate.

Luckily for nature lovers, Sacramento is a mind-bending bureaucratic black hole. Diagraming which politicians are beholden to what interest groups makes climate modeling look like grade school algebra. State employee unions, which are particularly strong, are not going to like this plan at all.

Add to that how Californians refuse to give up their entitlements, especially ones that have any whiff of environmentalism, and yeah, there's a good chance this is at least a partial bluff.

On the other hand, the state really is broke. So there are going to be a few cuts, if only in the context of broader belt-tightening. The most likely scenario is a few total closures of some really obscure parks, partial cutbacks at other parks, and no action at all on the rest. California is the state of San Francisco and Santa Monica; there are going to be at least a few more tax hikes before nature goes on the chopping block.

[Photo: Emerald Bay State Park. Neil Li / Wikimedia]

Related Stories:
· Closing parks will be hard, may not give enough relief [San Diego Union Tribune]
· Nature Coverage [Jaunted]
· California Travel Coverage [Jaunted]

0 Comments

Post a Comment

Leave a Comment

Not yet a member? Click here to become a member.

Already a member? Log in below:

Comment with your Facebook account.