/ / / /

Flybe Launches New Route, Except It Appears To Be Totally Useless

June 30, 2009 at 1:58 PM | by | Comments (2)

There’s nothing like a time when we’re all trying to watch our carbon footprints and up our train travel to launch a completely unnecessary flight route. But that’s exactly what Flybe has done this week. Yesterday, it launched its London to Leeds route with "red carpet celebrations" and a special appearance by a soap star (Matthew Bose from Emmerdale – no, we don’t know either, but we’re guessing he’s the fox in the middle of the photo here).

The only thing that we’re wondering is – why the hell have they done this? London to Leeds takes about two hours 20 minutes tops on the train. According to Flybe, the flight takes an hour and 10 minutes (actually it takes about 30 minutes, because we had the misfortune to be diverted to Leeds on a connecting flight to Manchester last year, and we’d barely cracked open the gin before we were landing). And it flies from Gatwick (30 minutes from central London, and that's if you take the expensive fast train) and into Leeds Bradford, 10 miles out of town.

Once you add on check-in time, wouldn’t it have been way better just to take the train? We’re confused. Obviously it’s nice to see one airline that’s doing well enough to launch a new route, but this route is just baffling. And the eco aspect means it’s just not cool.

Related Stories:
· Flybe Coverage [Jaunted]
· New Leeds-Bradford service to London starts [Telegraph & Argus]
· Flybe [Official Site]

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

Flybe New Route

If the trains were more competitively priced then there wouldn't be a demand. Low fare airlines do their research and wouldn't start a route if there wasn't a market

what

I have no idea why they thought this route would be a good idea. Like you say, London to Leeds is 2 hours on the train centre to centre. Add in the extra taxi time on either end for this flight and it would take far longer.

Join the conversation!

Not a member? .