That's what the CEO of Travelocity told a Senate subcommittee on tourism last Wednesday. As the AP points out, Sam Gilliland said that the Treasury Department hasn't done a good job defining acceptable versus unacceptable business travel, and that "meetings, conventions, and incentive travel," were important business tools, and not a frivolous luxury that can be curtailed to no ill effect. Gilliland was joined by five other travel executives, including the chairman of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, who provided examples of how business travel stimulates commerce and keeps people employed during rocky economic times.
Striking a similar tone, the editor of Elite Traveler, an in-flight magazine for private jets, caused a bit of a kerfuffle recently when he wrote that the rich should feel no guilt in flying their private jets and spending lavishly on parties. If you can afford it, he argued, there's no reason not to spend it, especially since it keeps an entire industry going.
I'm not exactly sure where the line between appropriate and inappropriate business travel should be drawn. Bailed-out CEO's probably don't deserve the champagne-fueled Jacuzzi romps they're used to, but I'm generally in favor of keeping things moving, and would acknowledge that conventions and corporate retreats are important ways to build a business. And as for those private jet owners, I say keep on flying! Just purchase your appropriate carbon credits, and give me a lift to someplace warm.
[Photo: BusinessWeek]
Related Stories:
· Travel Officials Push Back on Business Travel [AP via Yahoo! News]
· Elite Traveler Editor Defends Letter Urging Wealthy Readers to Keep Spending [Poynter Online]
· Business Travel Coverage [Jaunted]

0 Comments
Post a CommentReturn to » Clear as Mud: Business Travel is Totally Cool, Except for When it Isn't
Leave a Comment
Not yet a member? Click here to become a member.
Already a member? Log in below:
Comment with your Facebook account.