/ / / /

Your Body Belongs To TSA Now

April 8, 2009 at 11:04 AM | by | Comments (3)

April Fool? If only. When the TSA promised that its full-body scanners would only be used for secondary screening, it must have had its fingers crossed: Joe Sharkey reports in the New York Times that all metal detectors will be replaced with the clothes-penetrating devices because of good results from airports like Tulsa's, where they were offered as an alternative to the classic detectors.

TSA acting CTO Robin Kane even told Sharkey the agency got positive feedback from passengers, probably the ones who were standing behind the scanners looking at naked people.

In any case, you have until autumn, when the first ranks of machines are expected to be installed in airports around the country, to hide all your figure flaws. Of course, you can still opt for a pat-down instead, but will that get you tagged as suspicious? As William Saletan wrote in Slate, "The lesson of the escalating body scans, like the escalating pat-downs, is that TSA will do whatever it thinks it needs to do."

What did the TSA's Evolution of Security blog have to say about this invasion of privacy? Bupkis. Instead, it focused on a recent incident at St. Louis' Lambert International Airport which full-body scanners wouldn't have helped, in which a man with a metal box containing $4,700 in cash was pulled from line for questioning. Unfortunately for the agency's web presence on the Internets, 25-year-old Steve Bierfeldt was a Ron Paul supporter and the money was a political donation, causing an outcry of targeting for the search efforts. Apparently, he also had a large amount of bumper stickers on his person at the time, though those can be carried through security without a problem.

Political freedom is no joke, but we can see how that large an amount of cash could be a red flag. And that's pretty much what the TSA said, along with stopping just short of apologizing to Bierfeldt for one of its agents calling him "a smartass" in the part of the interrogation which he taped while protesting the interrogation process.

If you see a full-body scanner in the wild, or a suitcase full of cash for that matter, we'd love to hear about it.

Related Stories:
· Whole-Body Scans Pass First Airport Tests [NY Times]
· We See London, We See France, But Tulsa Sees Your Underpants [Jaunted]
· Deeper Digital Penetration: The expanding invasion of the naked body scanners. [Slate]
· TSA Caught on Tape Bullying Defenseless Ron Paul Supporter BlackBook]
· TSA coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo: silas216]

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

that woman in the pic

is having way too much fun at the security checkpoint. is this a staged photo from the TSA?

Arms up is required

When you get a full body scan, you have to put your arms up as not to miss anything that might be tucked under your arms.

Honestly, I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.  Anyone who has seen the images from these scans know there about as attractive as basic medical imagery: everyone is blue-toned, bald, and elastic bands and straps create contours on the body that would be a turn-off to anyone.  In short, you end up looking like the ugly step-child of Dr. Manhattan, and certainly unrecognizable to anyone who's actually seen you naked.


annoying

for as dynamic as this device should be, it's not. so first you have have to stand in this machine....then they scan you....someone in a back room reviews your scan, while you wait in a 3 step line to determine if they need to pad you down. it's not faster then going in the normal lines.

Join the conversation!

Not a member? .