Close User Name Password
Travel alerts straight to your inbox:
 

Tags: / /

So Why Do Women REALLY Study Abroad?

December 5, 2008 at 2:00 PM | by egw | 12 Comments

A recent study found that nearly twice as many women as men study abroad every year. Ellen Wernecke, assistant editor of Jaunted and lady, might just have an opinion on that.

Aaron Hotfelder of Gadling should have checked the label on the can of worms he opened up by reporting on a study of gender imbalance in study abroad programs. The Institute of International Education found that female students study abroad at nearly twice the rate of male students, a fact that given my study abroad experience (which was even more imbalanced, at about 20 percent male) I find completely unsurprising.

Somewhat more surprising? The first theory Inside Higher Ed advanced in reporting on this story.

IHE puts forth the idea that women go abroad during college because they want to hurry up and make babies. They quote a study-abroad associate director as saying that women "can't imagine being able to travel abroad and also be a mom. So if they're going to have an overseas experience, they're going to do it before they become mothers."

While women are trying to hurry up and procreate, men are all about the FUN parts of study abroad--like drinking and sports! Inside Higher Ed leads its coverage of the study with this priceless comment from a supposedly real study abroad director from Austin College about promoting study abroad for men:

Of course, if you're a guy who doesn't do languages, Australia and New Zealand are attractive and you can do guy things like kayaking and bungee jumping and so forth, pub crawling.

How smooth and subtle, Truett Cates! This reading does as much disservice to men--many of whom have better reasons for studying abroad than boozing it up and having some totally rad nights out--as women.

Then Gadling goes on to suggest that women study abroad more because they're dumb with money:

Study abroad can be expensive, and men are often, shall we say, "more frugal" than women.

Silly girls, spending their money on experiences they'll remember forever! My trips abroad have been priceless, and I'm sure men and women out there would say the same. Besides, the declining dollar affects travelers equally, does it not?

Now that I've alienated you all, here are my suggestions for why women study abroad more than men do:

1. Our superior communication skills make us less apprehensive about adapting to new places. Even though those "Women use twice as many words per day!" studies have been debunked, good interpersonal skills and high emotional intelligence help any traveler adjust to the social norms of a new culture. And women consistently score higher on tests of relationship management and social awareness.

2. To spin the "ticking clock" argument in a positive way, we're multitasking. Back in my college days, the biggest excuse I heard from my friends on why they didn't study abroad was that they couldn't find a way to manage major requirements, on-campus responsibilities and time away. Perhaps female students are more apt to grasp the possibilities that accompany the complications of enrolling in a study abroad program and see that opportunity as a way to "do it all" in college. I exploited my six months abroad to the hilt in all areas and still graduated on time.

3. Because we can. Maybe it doesn't come up on most applications, but the weight of history is a factor here. For so long women were discouraged from traveling alone anywhere, let alone to a foreign country where they might be exposed to less than ideal conditions or lecherous men. It was unthinkable for my grandmother, who got a journalism degree but married immediately after graduation; travel-wise, she's making up for it now, but there's no reason to wait that long. Our freedom to go to places like Egypt or Madagascar or Chile (to name a few) without a chaperon was hard won, so why should we give it up easily?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not in favor of the imbalance; the opportunity to study abroad should be available to everyone. But must we be blamed for that ratio, too? The onus is on overseas study providers and college deans to encourage more men to take advantage of these incredible opportunities, not to dissuade women at the same time.

Related Stories:
· Why Do Women Study Abroad Twice As Much As Men? [Gadling]
· Women Abroad and Men At Home [Inside Higher Ed]

[Photo of a Massachusetts HS trip to Greece, not mentioned in the article: nmhphotos]

12 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. Victor Ozols

    Jaunted Editor

    Women Win Again

    Women are torching men in every measurable way when it comes to higher education and the white-collar job world. It's no surprise to me that the XX chromosomes are studying abroad more than the XY's. Success in the real world isn't a matter of how well you can push a rock up a hill any more, it's about connecting with other people and using relationships to accomplish tasks. Guys use these skills to build beer-can pyramids in their dorm rooms while the ladies form French-language study groups so they can appreciate the masterpieces of the Louvre that much more. Still, it's nice to be able to open just about any jar. At least we've got that going for us.
    December 5, 2008 at 2:21 PM
  1. juliana

    Jaunted Contributing Editor

    i never once

    thought about hurrying up and making babies when i was in college. i think i was doing the exact opposite.
    December 5, 2008 at 2:23 PM
  1. JetSetCD

    Jaunted Editor

    whatever

    Gadling's explanations suck balls!!!!!!! During my 1.5 years of study abroad, it was my experience (seeing 3 total crops of study abroad kids come and go) that often it was the women who found the best and cheapest places to drink. In fact, we had a group of girls leading the cult around a certain bar in Rome they dubbed simply "cheap bar." The dudes would regularly practice their poker faces for when they'd head up to San Remo, win, and buy Armani suits - at 19! I went abroad because I didn't money to throw around, and youth is when it is justifiable to pay $19 for a hostel room or sleep in a train station. I did not go because I wanted to have children right away (ew). I wholeheartedly agree with Ellen on her third point: because we can. Almost all of my trips have been solo by choice, and although I have had to fight off my share of skeevy men, the dynamic is not the same as it was even ten years ago. And my scariest experience with a threatening dude was at THE VATICAN, so there.
    December 5, 2008 at 2:58 PM
  1. egw

    Jaunted Editor

    re:whatever

    My experience was at the Louvre, but you win.
    December 5, 2008 at 4:26 PM
  1. deva

    Jaunted Member

    superior what now?

    Gotta weigh in here. Our superior communication skills and higher emotional intelligence? I'm not such a fan of responding to (perceived) sexism with... more sexism. How is "Me dumb man...No can talk about feelings..." any better than "Silly girls, spending their money on experiences they'll remember forever!"? I'm not sure why people are taking the baby-making thing as a slur, either. Everyone I know (beyond hard-core traveling-mama bloggers) worries about being able to travel once they have kids - myself included. I worry about combining kids and my career, too (and in my case the career and the travel are not unrelated), but that doesn't mean anyone is winning any kind of psychological war to force me back into the kitchen. It's not anti-feminist to have concerns about this stuff. Besides, as I said on Aaron's original post, the statement was pretty ambiguous: isn't it possible he was taking a shot at male cheapskateness, rather than women being "dumb with money" as you put it? (And really, that's putting words in his mouth.) "But must we be blamed for that ratio, too?" Who is pointing fingers here? I didn't get any hint that Aaron was saying he was some sort of oppressed-by-women study abroad minority. Seriously?
    December 5, 2008 at 5:12 PM
  1. juliana

    Jaunted Contributing Editor

    ain't no shame in baby-making

    hmmm...i didn't take the baby-making thing as a "slur" but i thought it was a weak explanation as to why college-aged women go abroad more than men. i don't think "traveling before i have kids" was even a concern until i reached 28.

    i fully admit that for my 30th birthday in september i wanted to go to some European cities that i hadn't visited before i had kids. (unfortch, traveling just made me realize how i don't want to be a mom yet.) however, those thoughts come a little bit later in life than when you're 20.

    i studied in italy (in a six-week program) solely bc i wanted to be free of my overprotective parents and to drink legally without the hassle of fake ID. yes, i was that shallow then.

    December 5, 2008 at 5:27 PM
  1. juliana

    Jaunted Contributing Editor

    PS. Victor

    I don't even need you to open a jar for me any more. I got one of those contraptions at Bed and Bath that take off the lids of any kind of jar!
    December 5, 2008 at 5:30 PM
  1. AaronHotfelder

    Jaunted Member

    Get un-offended

    In writing that men are often "more frugal" than women, I meant only that men are cheap. This was a light-hearted dig at my own gender, I assure you, not anything sinister. I didn't mean to imply that women are wasting money on study abroad-- just the opposite, in fact.
    December 5, 2008 at 8:21 PM
  1. egw

    Jaunted Editor

    re: superior what now?

    Women do score better on tests measuring interpersonal skills -- not that every woman is better at that kind of social intelligence than every man, but that's an accepted and tested theory. And I don't mind if women taking their future children in mind is a factor of when they travel -- I just don't think it's THE factor, or the one that needs to be brought in first. I'm pointing fingers because I think the assumptions of the Inside Higher Article and the Gadling post are a little dangerous, even if you don't take that next logical step and say, "Study abroad programs need to be changed to be more attractive to men." And that's where I see it going.
    December 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM
  1. deva

    Jaunted Member

    re: ain't no shame, re: superior what now

    "however, those thoughts come a little bit later in life than when you're 20." @juliana For you, sure. But not for everybody. I thought it was a completely valid point that matched the experiences of my friends and myself. I'm 26, and the family/life balance has been a concern of mine for awhile now. "Women do score better on tests measuring interpersonal skills -- not that every woman is better at that kind of social intelligence than every man, but that's an accepted and tested theory." @egw Women also rank as higher spenders in all the consumer data I've ever read about. Even factoring in the impact/legacy of the "traditional role in the household" side of things (grocery shopping, back to school supplies, etc), it seems we still consume more "leisure" type items. In which case, are people actually getting offended by an accepted and tested theory? (Besides which, Aaron has said you've all misunderstood him. Anyone care to acknowledge that?)
    December 7, 2008 at 10:08 AM
  1. egw

    Jaunted Editor

    re: get un-offended

    Sure, but at the risk of opening another can of worms, the students who are choosing study abroad probably aren't considering price in their decisions. And that goes for both genders. The cost is much more likely to be a factor when people are planning their individual trips, but but that wasn't covered on the study (if only it was!)
    December 7, 2008 at 1:15 PM
  1. egw

    Jaunted Editor

    re: deva

    Perhaps you misunderstand the real target here. What Aaron wrote was largely quoting/ paraphrasing from the "Inside Higher Ed" article, which took a study that could be read in a variety of ways and put primacy on an argument which I thought reflected a biased and sexist viewpoint. I'm sure he realizes I don't blame him for reporting on this news, although I would prefer to advance some reasons for the difference reported in the study that doesn't knock down either gender. That's why I decided to respond to it in a post with more substance than a simplistic put-down.
    December 7, 2008 at 1:23 PM

Leave a Comment

Not yet a member? Click here to become a member.

Already a member? Log in below:

Comment with your Facebook account.