/ / / / / / /

Travel Referendums: Considering Cuba

Where: Cuba
October 24, 2008 at 4:14 PM | by | Comments (2)

This November 4 is about more than just deciding between McCain and Obama. Other issues that directly affect travelers are up for decision, and this week we're taking a closer look at some of them.

Early in the Democratic primaries, Sen. Christopher Dodd, a returned Peace Corps volunteer, talked up the fact that all the American embargo on Cuba seems to accomplish is getting presidential candidates those 27 electoral votes in the swing state of Florida. We haven't heard much about Cuba policy ever since everyone's money evaporated, but there remain differences between the two possible presidents on whether or not the US should ease its embargo.

Barack Obama brought up the "pander to Cubans in Florida" aspect of campaigning when he spoke in Miami back in May. Before that, he stated that his administration would hold a "series of meetings with low-level diplomats" in Cuba. On the travel tip, though, Obama's policy isn't encouraging to would-be tourists from the US who want to obey the law. His stance on Cuba:

In the case of Cuba, [he and Biden] will empower our best ambassadors of freedom by allowing unlimited Cuban-American family travel and remittances to the island. Using aggressive and principled bilateral diplomacy he will also send an important message: If a post-Fidel government takes significant steps toward democracy, beginning with freeing all political prisoners, the US is prepared to take steps to normalize relations and ease the embargo that has governed relations between our countries for the last five decades.

For his part, John McCain wants to keep the embargo just how it is. Here's his official statement on Cuba:

John McCain will press the Cuban regime to unconditionally release all political prisoners, legalize all political parties, labor unions and free media, and schedule internationally monitored elections. The embargo must stay in place....

John McCain will provide more material assistance and moral support to human rights activists and increase Radio and TV Marti and other means to communicate directly to the Cuban people.

McCain also tries to drum up some anti-Castro rage by saying that Obama "wants to sit down unconditionally for a presidential meeting with Raul Castro."

What he's referring to are these comments made on February 21 during Obama's debate with Hillary Clinton. If you don't want to watch the video, here's a broader look at what Obama said:

Keep in mind that the starting point for our policy in Cuba should be the liberty of the Cuban people. And I think we recognize that that liberty has not existed throughout the Castro regime. And we now have an opportunity to potentially change the relationship between the United States and Cuba after over half a century.

I would meet without preconditions, although Senator Clinton is right that there has to be preparation. It is very important for us to make sure that there was an agenda, and on that agenda was human rights, releasing of political prisoners, opening up the press. And that preparation might take some time.

Interestingly, there's another Republican up for election this year who does support ending the embargo. He's Wyoming Sen. Mike Enzi, and he introduced legislation last year--which is currently languishing in committee--to end travel restrictions completely. Then again, he can afford to introduce politically risky bills: Right now, he's ahead by 27 points.

Related Stories:
· The Candidates on Cuba Policy [CFR]
· Enzi Advocates Real Change on Cuba Policy [Official Site]
· Barack Obama on Cuba [Official Site]
· John McCain on Cuba [Official Site]
· I Am Cuba: a Celluloid Journey to the Forbidden Caribbean Isle [Jaunted]

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

Let's normalize relations with Cuba

Thanks for your posting. As a journalist, I've been able to travel to Cuba many times in the past decade, but everyone ought to be able to see the island for themselves. My father and his parents lived in Cuba from 1939 to 1942. They were German Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany, and not political left-wingers. That family history is where my own interest in Cuba comes from. Cuban society today represents an effort to build an alternative to the way life was under the dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista, who ran Cuba before Fidel Castro led a revolution there. No one complained about a lack of human rights and democracy in those days, but U.S. businesses were protected. Some things work, some don't. Like any society, Cuba its flaws and contradictions, as well as having some solid achievements. No society is perfect. But we can certainly learn a few things from Cuba's experience. For over eight years I've operated a Yahoo news group focusing on Cuba where over 90,000 items from, about or related to Cuba can be found in its free, easy-to-use archives. Details here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaNews/ Thanks, Walter Lippmann Los Angeles, California

re conditions for allowing us to travel to Cuba

"In the case of Cuba, [Obama and Biden] will empower our best ambassadors of freedom by allowing unlimited Cuban-American family travel and remittances to the island". McCain in addition wants "free press, trade unions and political parties". Re the Obama-Biden plan, good but no cigar. While I wholly support removing the restrictions on travel and remittances by Cuban-American families, I have to say that anyone who believes that the "best ambassadors of freedom" are to be found in Miami has never been there, never talked to Cuban American journalists, art collectors and religious figures who've been rewarded for their advocacy of normal relations with the unfettered violence of the rightwing members of that community, ranging from boycotts to bombs. Not all Cuban-Americans are "good ambassadors of freedom and democracy". And, what about the other 99% of Americans who might want to travel to Cuba? Aren't we "good ambassadors of freedom"? The article goes on to say " Using aggressive and principled bilateral diplomacy he will also send an important message: If a post-Fidel government takes significant steps toward democracy, beginning with freeing all political prisoners". OK, since diplomacy usually involves a two-way street, how about proposing that normal relations will begin when both countries take significant steps toward democracy, beginning with freeing of all political prisoners? After all, why should Cuba's political prisoners go free while hundreds of political prisoners still languish in US prisons -- some, like Leonard Peltier or Marilyn Buck, for more than twice as long as the longest-held prisoner in Cuba? And to advance "democracy" in each place, Cuba could begin posting the histories of the counterrevolutionary "dissidents" who would like to run for office alongside those of the candidates who have popular backing, while the US could make all elections truly "free" by removing all costs from electoral campaigns: every candidate would be given equal access to the radio and tv airwaves, print media, and travel at public expense. (The costs would be covered by taking the necessary amount from the military budget.) As for Mr. McCain's proposals, the concept of "free press" was effectively described by AJ Liebling, founder of The New Yorker magazine, when he wrote:"Freedom of the press exists only for those who own one", and in this country, "that ain't you and me". Like most islanders, Cubans look carefully at what happens around the world, to see what they might want to borrow or adapt. And our two-party political system, with all its sniping, backbiting, and outright lying, combined with outrageous false promises doesn't hold strong appeal. They prefer the non-partisan elections that many states require for important positions, such as judges, so that those who hold public office will do so in the name of all the people, not just in the interests of one party or class.

Join the conversation!

Not a member? .