Travel alerts straight to your inbox:

Amtrak Ridership Through the Roof: Time for Some New Ideas in U.S. Train Travel

October 11, 2008 at 2:11 PM | 1 Comment

The U.S. government-owned passenger rail company known as Amtrak is finally having its moment in the sun. After more than three decades as a money-losing symbol of government waste, bureaucratic ineptitude, and U.S. consumers' overwhelming preference for car travel, Amtrak's ridership is surging, bolstered by high gas prices and a growing distaste for short-distance air travel. While we here at Jaunted HQ are wary of calling this a watershed moment for U.S. train travel, it does represent an opportunity to reacquaint people with the joys of riding the rails - and might also be a rare opportunity to bring the 1970's-era rail line into the 21st century.

After the jump, a few ideas for Amtrak that just might be crazy enough to work.

One of the biggest problems Amtrak has had to face throughout the years is its lack of exclusive railroad tracks. Almost all of the train tracks in the U.S. are owned by rail freight companies, which means that Amtrak trains are often delayed by freight trains that have priority on the tracks. Of course it would be a huge expense, but now just might be the time to lay down a new system of tracks across the country for passenger trains only. It could represent a way to put the rising ranks of the unemployed to work, and would also be a huge step toward this "energy independence" thing people keep talking about. After all, train travel has a lower environmental impact than both flying and driving, and it's smoother and more comfortable to boot.

And as long as we're laying down new tracks, let's develop a new kind of train. Americans have shown their preference for large vehicles. Witness the popularity of SUV's, wide-body jets, and increasingly huge cruise ships. Maybe we need to start making double-wide trains. Hear me out: instead of being merely a means of transport, trains could become mini-destinations themselves, with spacious seats, internet-enabled business lounges, fancy restaurants and bars, and retail stores. Passengers are more likely to tolerate slower train speeds if they're comfortable and occupied, and it would open up a new tourism market as well: the train trip as cruise. Come on, if they can pull it off in Europe, Australia, and Canada, why not in the USA? We'd be thrilled to go on a trans-American luxury train ride.

Finally, we've got to use the latest thinking in train travel to keep things running smoothly. In order to be a viable form of transportation, trains have to depart and arrive on time. One way to achieve this would be to streamline the process of boarding and disembarking passengers. It wouldn't work for big hubs, but for local stations, why not try the Taiwanese method of boarding trains that never stop? That way the train would merely need to slow down to accommodate the handful of passengers who need to get out at Palookaville and still make it to Capital City on time.

This is all a long-shot, of course, but as someone who commutes by train every day of his life, I'd love to see a U.S. rail system that's so good, people would be happy to leave the cars at home and take the train. So come on, America, let's beat the Europeans at their own game and give our country the best rail system on earth. I'll see you in the rolling cocktail lounge.

[Photo: Amtrak]

Related Stories:
· Amtrak Reports Record Annual Ridership [USA Today]
· Amtrak [Official Site]
· Amtrak Coverage [Jaunted]

1 Comment

  1. yaarchitect

    Jaunted Member
    October 12, 2008 at 10:21 PM




    Nationwide Bus/Train Coordination Grid

    Look at the whole USA, Canada, Mexico as one unique body, try to get the system to be re frachized with a mix of Public/Private Sectors input, to involve Equipment, Schedules and Profit Feedbacks to Regional Benefits, enough of Union influence on account of Public Benefits. Use Good Equipment, People will come!; Look at the German System, and learn; forget the Japanese and the French models. Transportation must some how be coordinated with ARCHITECTURE and PLANNING Professions, NOT ENGINEERING

Leave a Comment

Not yet a member? Click here to become a member.
Already a member? Login below:

Nickname:

Password:

Send us a tip