Terminal Diagnosis
Monster coverage of the NAT/T4 Terminal in Madrid! Monster coverage because the terminal itself is mammoth: $1.2 Billion dollars for the buildings alone, 9,000 parking spaces in the parking garage, and 174 check-in desks.
The question remains, to what end? Is design simply the new camouflage to help push through municipal boondoggles?
Barajas' terminal is a gigantic project, based on huge projected increased in passenger traffic: From 48 million passengers a year to 70 million. It's hard to believe that 22 million additional passengers will now want to fly via Madrid to see a bamboo roof and avoid harsh fluorescent lighting. Everyone can benefit from good lighting, sure, but many Americans fly in their pyjamas. It's hard to see them making bulb-based travel decisions.
Still, a snazzy new airport is a better civic investment than the Olympics. We'd trade Bode Miller for Jean Nouvel or Frank Gehry any day.
[Image via txmx.2/Flickr]
Related Stories:
· Spanish Fly [Jaunted]
· Jumbo Proportions [The Guardian]
· Best Public Space 2006 [Travel + Leisure, now online]
Leave a Comment
Not yet a member? Click here to become a member.
Already a member? Login below: