"Just try it, Peters," seems to be the message from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which announced today that it would disallow departures or arrivals that are "issued by auction or similar process," saying such slot sales "would be illegal without Congressional authorization."

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is lining up behind the authority, agreeing with the position that auctions will only cause fares to go up while doing nothing to alleviate the congestion that has choked New York area airports over the past few years.

So what does he propose instead? Schumer thinks upgrading air traffic control equipment and adding staff at control towers will rid the region of delays and cancellations. Maybe he could interest you in a six-figure hiring bonus?

Related Stories:
· Port Authority Will Block US Plan to Auction Airport Slots [NYT]
· Port Authority Acts to Block Flights [Official Site]
· Secretary Mary Peters Wants to Touch That Paper [Jaunted]

[Photo: ATIS547]]]> pbb 2008-08-04T16:30:04-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/7/22/141233/463

While last year's summer of airline hell has yet to repeat itself, the US government is still working on a way to keep it from happening again. And Transportation Secretary Mary Peters thinks that slot auctions are the way to go, something she's been hyping since at least last December.

But the airlines don't want to pay more for landing rights they already have--especially when they're already bleeding cash. And while Secretary Peters makes some decent points in her latest defense of auctions, her case is more than a little thin.]]> pbb 2008-07-22T14:15:07-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/6/19/132037/813

The Feds are still trying to sort out the mess plaguing New York area airports even though this summer (so far) has nothing on last year's nightmarish streak of delays and cancellations. At issue now are the slot auctions proposed by the Bush administration in May and whether they'll be able to save American aviation from itself.

Surprisingly, the airlines and New York's Port Authority--which controls the airports--are lining up behind Democrats, who say President Bush's market-based scheme won't work. Says Sen. Chuck Schumer:

Instead of focusing on real, tested solutions to solve this problem, like upgrading decades-old technology and hiring an adequate number of controllers to staff New York's towers, the [Department of Transportation] continues to miss the point.

Republicans--and the DOT--insist that auctioning off some takeoff and landing slots is the best way to spur competition while maintaining flight caps. Of course, no one's ever tried that before, so they have no idea if it's actually going to work.

By the time all the debate is over, though, the congestion problem may be a non-issue. With fuel prices going up and carriers lurching closer to bankruptcy, there may soon be plenty of room for the few airlines still in business!

Related Stories:
· Debate Over Auctioning of Airport Landing Slots [NYT]
· Airlines Moving to the Grown-up Table [Politico]
· New York Area Airports coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo: triplexpresso]]]> pbb 2008-06-19T13:30:01-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/5/19/152024/214

At the end of last week, the Department of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters proposed that Newark International and JFK auction off landing slots to increase competition at both airports. As long as takeoffs and landings are capped, the feds are worried that ticket prices could go up while the quality of service at New York's airports goes down.

To keep that from happening, the DOT wants to take a small portion of landing slots from all the airlines and sell 'em. The idea is that the auction will open up the market to new competitors and keep things fair--except for the whole "We took your landing slots" part of the plan, of course.

But will this slot selling--which has never been attempted at a major airport--actually spark competition? Industry watcher Brett Snyder doesn't think so:

In the end we'll probably see airlines like Continental bid high for Newark slots so they can keep the ones they have now and possibly even gain some more. The low cost carriers? Well, there's a reason they're low cost. They probably won't be able to afford the price of entry.

Related Stories:
· DOT Issues Recommendations for Reducing Delays [BNet]
· US Plans Steps to Ease Congestion at Airports [NYT]
· New York Area Airports coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo: triplexpresso]]]> pbb 2008-05-19T15:30:02-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/12/19/134955/31

At a highly anticipated press conference today, Department of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters announced that flights in and out of JFK would be capped at 83 per hour for at least the next two years, starting in March 2008. As it stands now, about 100 flights per hour are scheduled at peak times. Currently available takeoff and landing slots will not be auctioned off to the highest bidder, as some airlines feared.

At least not yet. Secretary Peters says any new slots created through technology or airport improvements will be auctioned to the highest bidder if and when they become available. While President Bush would say that the plan allows market forces to control JFK, requiring a massive upfront investment in the form of takeoff and landing fees effectively locks out upstart innovators with limited capital.

JetBlue has already issued a statement on the caps, with CEO David Barger saying:

We applaud the DOT and FAA's actions to address congestion and enhance capacity at JFK. These capacity enhancements coupled with the regrettable, but necessary, temporary hourly caps on operations will greatly improve JetBlue's operational reliability.

Negotiations about flight caps at Newark are still underway; LaGuardia already has a limit on takeoffs and landings.

Related Stories:
· Kennedy Airport Flights Will Be Reduced [Newsday]
· Feds Close to Action on JFK Mess [Jaunted]
· Reactions: The DOT's Plan for JFK [Jaunted]
· Airport Hell coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo of JFK: Carl Puentes Photography]]]> pbb 2007-12-19T13:53:57-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/12/11/91413/060

The federal government is close to action on the unprecedented congestion at JFK and other New York-area airports, says the New York Times. Department of Transportation secretary Mary Peters will hand President Bush a list of recommendations next week, and the government should take action before the end of the year. Possibilities include an auction for takeoff and landing slots, which is more likely than charging airlines extra for flights at peak times.

Whatever happens, at least one aviation consultant knows it's gonna be bad:

Will people get hurt? Of course they will. The flying public is the one that always gets hurt in these things.

When we spoke with Fred Reid last week, the idea of an auction to reallocate slots didn't come up. But we're guessing he won't be happy if that's the way things go; here's what he told us on December 6:

Historically, when slot allocations have been made, the government has wisely decided to allow for some slots for new entrants--and that is the case we are making here.

JetBlue for instance was given 70 slots at JFK as a new carrier. The DOT has always given consideration to consumer choice and competition in the market. This has long been a fundamental policy consideration.

If it does come down to who has the deepest pockets, things at New York's airports could turn mighty expensive.

Related Stories:
· US to Limit Flights at Kennedy [NYT]
· Jaunted Interview: Chatting With Fred Reid [Jaunted]
· JFK coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo of JFK: Carl Puentes Photography]]]> pbb 2007-12-11T09:30:02-05:00 Search Jaunted string http://www.jaunted.com/search/