Southwest has made a $7.5 million bid for 14 slots at LaGuardia, one of the assets of ATA, the carrier's former code share partner which is now in bankruptcy proceedings. If the deal is approved by an Indianapolis court, Southwest could start service to New York City by next year, with seven departures and seven arrivals a day.

Though Southwest is the only bidder, the company is still being cautious about the deal:

What today’s announcement means is that we have formally made a bid--which, if approved by the court, will enable Southwest Airlines to be able to expand with our own Red Bellied Birds into a market that we first developed via our ATA codeshare.

Now, again, guys--this isn’t a done deal. At this point it’s only a bid that would allow us to assume ATA's slots, so we’re not ready to talk about where we’ll fly and things like that. But Southwest service to New York’s LaGuardia airport is now a definite possibility.

The closest Southwest currently comes to NYC is Long Island MacArthur Airport, which is convenient for people in Suffolk County but not really a great option for city-dwellers.

Related Stories:
· Start Spreadin' the... Possibility? [Nuts about Southwest]
· Southwest to Buy ATA to Get Slots [DMN]
· Despite ATA Collapse, Southwest Still Wants to Fly You Abroad [Jaunted]

[Photo: ChicagoEye]]]> pbb 2008-11-19T08:25:47-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/8/4/162421/5154

"Just try it, Peters," seems to be the message from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which announced today that it would disallow departures or arrivals that are "issued by auction or similar process," saying such slot sales "would be illegal without Congressional authorization."

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is lining up behind the authority, agreeing with the position that auctions will only cause fares to go up while doing nothing to alleviate the congestion that has choked New York area airports over the past few years.

So what does he propose instead? Schumer thinks upgrading air traffic control equipment and adding staff at control towers will rid the region of delays and cancellations. Maybe he could interest you in a six-figure hiring bonus?

Related Stories:
· Port Authority Will Block US Plan to Auction Airport Slots [NYT]
· Port Authority Acts to Block Flights [Official Site]
· Secretary Mary Peters Wants to Touch That Paper [Jaunted]

[Photo: ATIS547]]]> pbb 2008-08-04T16:30:04-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/7/22/141233/463

While last year's summer of airline hell has yet to repeat itself, the US government is still working on a way to keep it from happening again. And Transportation Secretary Mary Peters thinks that slot auctions are the way to go, something she's been hyping since at least last December.

But the airlines don't want to pay more for landing rights they already have--especially when they're already bleeding cash. And while Secretary Peters makes some decent points in her latest defense of auctions, her case is more than a little thin.]]> pbb 2008-07-22T14:15:07-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2008/6/19/132037/813

The Feds are still trying to sort out the mess plaguing New York area airports even though this summer (so far) has nothing on last year's nightmarish streak of delays and cancellations. At issue now are the slot auctions proposed by the Bush administration in May and whether they'll be able to save American aviation from itself.

Surprisingly, the airlines and New York's Port Authority--which controls the airports--are lining up behind Democrats, who say President Bush's market-based scheme won't work. Says Sen. Chuck Schumer:

Instead of focusing on real, tested solutions to solve this problem, like upgrading decades-old technology and hiring an adequate number of controllers to staff New York's towers, the [Department of Transportation] continues to miss the point.

Republicans--and the DOT--insist that auctioning off some takeoff and landing slots is the best way to spur competition while maintaining flight caps. Of course, no one's ever tried that before, so they have no idea if it's actually going to work.

By the time all the debate is over, though, the congestion problem may be a non-issue. With fuel prices going up and carriers lurching closer to bankruptcy, there may soon be plenty of room for the few airlines still in business!

Related Stories:
· Debate Over Auctioning of Airport Landing Slots [NYT]
· Airlines Moving to the Grown-up Table [Politico]
· New York Area Airports coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo: triplexpresso]]]> pbb 2008-06-19T13:30:01-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/12/19/134955/31

At a highly anticipated press conference today, Department of Transportation Secretary Mary Peters announced that flights in and out of JFK would be capped at 83 per hour for at least the next two years, starting in March 2008. As it stands now, about 100 flights per hour are scheduled at peak times. Currently available takeoff and landing slots will not be auctioned off to the highest bidder, as some airlines feared.

At least not yet. Secretary Peters says any new slots created through technology or airport improvements will be auctioned to the highest bidder if and when they become available. While President Bush would say that the plan allows market forces to control JFK, requiring a massive upfront investment in the form of takeoff and landing fees effectively locks out upstart innovators with limited capital.

JetBlue has already issued a statement on the caps, with CEO David Barger saying:

We applaud the DOT and FAA's actions to address congestion and enhance capacity at JFK. These capacity enhancements coupled with the regrettable, but necessary, temporary hourly caps on operations will greatly improve JetBlue's operational reliability.

Negotiations about flight caps at Newark are still underway; LaGuardia already has a limit on takeoffs and landings.

Related Stories:
· Kennedy Airport Flights Will Be Reduced [Newsday]
· Feds Close to Action on JFK Mess [Jaunted]
· Reactions: The DOT's Plan for JFK [Jaunted]
· Airport Hell coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo of JFK: Carl Puentes Photography]]]> pbb 2007-12-19T13:53:57-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/11/21/141559/89
TPA: Great airport=no lines...

We admittedly have a bit of a Zagat obsession right now, but we can't overlook the latest survey from the folks at the Burgundy Bible. A look at US airlines, it was compiled in conjunction with the Today show and relied on the opinions of 7,498 flyers and travel pros.

We probably don't need to tell you the big-picture findings:

Overall, our survey results reveal continuing frustration with the state of domestic air travel... Delays and cancellations were cited as the top airline irritants, follwed by cramped seats/crowding and poor service.

But there were some high points. Virgin America ranked as a "premium" airline (rather than an "economy" one, despite low fares) and performed miles ahead of other carriers in comfort, service and food. VA topped second-place Continental in all three categories. On the budget side of things, Midwest Airlines was the clear favorite. (Could it be simply because of the free cookies on every flight?)

Airports also got the critical eye, with Tampa and Denver earning the best scores from travelers. Two of New York's much-maligned time vortexes (JFK and LGA) earned spots at the bottom of the list, along with Miami, LAX and Philadelphia.

Related Stories:
· Full Survey Results [Zagat.com]
· Virgin America coverage [Jaunted]
· Midwest Airlines coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo: Tampa International Airport]]]> pbb 2007-11-21T14:30:01-05:00 http://www.jaunted.com/story/2007/11/6/12249/8117

A two-part post about airport congestion. The UK half of the story.

So yesterday, we had a bit of a sky-is-falling attitude after reading a big story about the horrific state of New York-area airports. But as it turns out, things are actually getting better for flyers--as long as they skip LGA, JFK and EWR. According to a new USA Today report, dozens of airports outside New York have actually had fewer delays this year than last.

Hard to believe, right? Here's how it's possible:

In New York, there are too many scheduled flights and hemmed-in airports that can't expand. But at other major airports, new runways, incremental improvements in air-traffic procedures and airlines' moves to improve efficiency have begun to make a measurable difference for travelers.

For example, Atlanta's opened a new runway that's responsible for a 40% drop in delays. Boston Logan had similar success with a new landing strip. Competition has also freed up airspace: As carriers have cut flights to San Francisco, St. Louis and Washington Dulles, delays have dissipated.

This isn't to say all is well; the industry still has a lot of work to do. But as the carriers and regulators work out what's to be done for our broken system, it's important to realize that some parts don't yet need fixing.

Related Stories:
· For Many, Airport Wait Times Get Shorter [USA Today]
· New York's An Awful Place to Fly [Jaunted]
· Airport Hell coverage [Jaunted]

[Photo, ironically, of YYZ: News46]]]> pbb 2007-11-06T12:35:01-05:00 Search Jaunted string http://www.jaunted.com/search/