<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/">
<title>Jaunted - Tag: Fees</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/</link>
<description>The Pop Culture Travel Guide</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2006 - SFO MEDIA</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2012-02-10T06:55:12Z</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Jaunted</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>Jaunted</dc:creator>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2012/2/3/11623/74333" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/24/173723/285" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/5/15430/91180" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/1/19/135942/115" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/11/6/163841/204" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/9/12/141958/015" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/7/2/123028/8894" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/images/jauntedw.jpg" />
<textinput rdf:resource="http://www.jaunted.com/search/" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/images/jauntedw.jpg">
<title>Jaunted</title>
<url>http://www.jaunted.com/images/jauntedw.jpg</url>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Fees</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2012/2/3/11623/74333">
<title>Spirit Airlines Throws Temper Tantrum, Hikes Fees</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2012/2/3/11623/74333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/22421/2012_02_03_JA___SpiritAirlines.jpg" class="top"><p> It seems like <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2012/1/30/132149/045/travel/Spanair+Shuts+Down%2C+Airline+Industry+Poised+for+Even+Worse+in+2012">only Monday</a> when we were saying that it might be a bad idea to force airlines&#151;some of whom barely have a pulse, as exemplified by the <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/american%20airlines"><b>American Airlines</b></a> bankruptcy&#151;to give up on all the ways they've invented to make money. No one denies that some airline fees are insanely grating, and we complain about them as much as anyone, but with the <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/airline%20industry"><b>airline industry</b></a> recovering from the worst decade ever, maybe this isn't the <em>perfect</em> time for heavy-handed government brainstorming. No one wants a repeat of the <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2011/6/3/135824/6631/travel/%27Tarmac+Delay%27+Groups+Push+for+Newer%2C+More+Expensive+Airline+Regulations">tarmac delays debacle,</a> after all. <p>Naturally the Department of Transportation has chosen <em>now</em> to pass a series of new regulations, including a ban on ticket-change fees for changes made within 24 hours of booking. And we could be doing a post about whether those are bad ideas in theory or in practice or in both. But instead we're going to write about the reaction of <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/spirit%20airlines"><b>Spirit Airlines</b></a> to the DOT's decision. <b>Because if the<a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/ryanair"><b>Ryanair</b></a> of North America has a specialty, it's in taking something mildly obnoxious and completely owning it.</b> ]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      </description>
<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-02-03T13:17:32-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/24/173723/285">
<title>Hidden Airline Fees to Come Clean, and You Can Thank the Senate</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/24/173723/285</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/6193/TaxesExtra.jpg" class="top"> <p>Do you know what all that text above is? It's what you're shown (but minimized a bit to fit into our image area) when you click on the "Taxes & Fees" breakdown while booking airfare on <a href="http://www.travelocity.com">Travelocity</a>. It's not limited to Travelocity either, the amount the small text you have to read to figure out where those extra charges come into play. And the Federal Aviation Administration isn't all that happy about how confusing hidden airline fees are for consumers, and they're doing something about it. <p>Report the <i><a href="http://intransit.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/legislation-to-uncover-hidden-airline-fees/#more-26103">New York Times</a></i>: <blockquote><p> A provision was added to the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill, passed by the Senate earlier this week, that would require airlines and online travel agencies to <b>clearly disclose all fees associated with the cost of a ticket</b>, including holiday surcharges, baggage fees and seat assignments.</p></blockquote><p> <p>So will passengers, when they see a "holiday surcharge," run to another carrier that doesn't have one? Only time will tell we suppose, But for those whose airline loyalty trumps all, we doubt it'll make a difference. Still, <b>disclosing everything is always the honorable thing to do</b>. <p><b>Related Stories:</b><br> &#183; <a href="http://intransit.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/legislation-to-uncover-hidden-airline-fees/#more-26103">Legislation to Uncover Hidden Airline Fees</a> [NYT]<br> &#183; <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/airline%20fees">Airline Fees</a> [Jaunted]<br> <p><i>[Photo: Travelocity]</i>]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </description>
<dc:creator>JetSetCD</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T17:37:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/5/15430/91180">
<title>How Much is Seven Extra Inches of Legroom on Continental Worth to You? </title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/3/5/15430/91180</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/6193/AirplaneSeatMaps.jpg" class="top"> <p>The money streaming in from <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/baggage%20fees">baggage fees</a> is spoiling the airlines rotten. So while millions upon millions of fresh greenbacks come over the check-in counter as passengers get caught by the new fees, the airlines continue to look for more ways to make an extra buck. And although <b><a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/continental">Continental</a></b> is keeping their <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/2/26/75735/7450/travel/Continental%27s+Free+Meals+in+Coach+Safe+For+Now+as+Focus+Turns+to+First+Class">free meals</a> in economy <i>for now</i>, they will be <b>charging additional now for something they never have before: seats with more legroom</b>. <P>It's a very low-cost-carrier move, one that airlines like Jetblue and Virgin America can get away with, but Continental? Times&#151;they are a-changing! Or they will be beginning on March 17 when Continental offers up unreserved coach seats with more legroom with more cash at check-in. A quick visit to <a href="http://www.seatguru.com">SeatGuru.com</a> should tip you off as to which seats will get the $$ treatment or not (hint: definitely the ones highlighted in green), and in some cases, we're talking up to <b>seven extra inches of legroom</b>. <p>The premium coach seats&#151;since that's what they really are&#151;will go on sale as upgrades 24 hours before the flight, available if you check-in on Continental.com or at the airport, based on availability. Price will be determined by flight length, of course. <p><b>Related Stories:</b><br> &#183; <a href="http://www.asiatraveltips.com/news10/43-Legroom.shtml">Continental Airlines to Sell Seat Assignments</a> [ATTips]<br> &#183; <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/continental">Continental Airlines News</a> [Jaunted]<br> &#183; <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/airline%20news">Airline News</a> [Jaunted]<br> <p><i>[Images: <a href="http://www.seatguru">SeatGuru</a>]</i>]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            </description>
<dc:creator>JetSetCD</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T08:34:31-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/1/19/135942/115">
<title>United Slapped With Massive Fine For Hiding Booking Fees</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/1/19/135942/115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/6193/2010_01_18_JA___DOTUnited.jpg" class="top"><p>Even before the <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/1/12/153443/995/travel/Continental+is+Also+Charging+%2425+for+the+First+Checked+Bag">multi-carrier</a> hikes in <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Baggage%20Fees"><b>baggage fees</b></a> that happened <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2010/1/15/05958/8456/travel/United+Airlines+and+US+Airways+Happily+Match+Checked+Bag+Fee+Hike+to+%2425">last week,</a> we saw fee hike after fee hike after fee hike. From <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/7/31/144524/137/travel/Cha-Ching!+Airlines+Raking+In+Change+And+Cancellation+Fees">change and cancellation fees</a> to charging for <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/9/25/12590/0960/travel/British+Airways+Introduces+Shiny+New+Fee+For+Selecting+Your+Seat">seat selection,</a> 2009 was a case study in how airlines can raise <em>actual</em> prices without raising <em>published</em> prices. It's no secret why companies went with that kind of nickel-and-dime strategy. It's not just that people are making their purchases from meta-search engines like Kayak, where they often click on the lowest listed price without looking at much else. It's also about the airlines' ability to publish attention-grabbing fares and to push eye-popping ads. <p>Now it turns out that <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/united%20airlines"><b>United Airlines</b></a> might have traveled one bridge too far in their journey of opacity. The U.S. Department of Transportation has hit the airline with a <b>whooping $30,000 fine</b> for violating price advertising and publishing rules. For their part, United officials are blaming a programming error that kept a 7.5% federal excise tax&#151;something they're supposed to bundle into the price&#151;off their web listings for two and a half days. This is the second time in a few months they've pulled this stunt, and as CNN explains the DOT <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/15/united.airlines.fine/">has had enough of their nonsense:</a>]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  </description>
<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-01-20T10:25:03-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/11/6/163841/204">
<title>Expedia Shocks Travel Industry And Customers, Actually Lowers Fees</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/11/6/163841/204</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/22421/2009_11_02_JA___ExpediaPhone.jpg" class="top"><p><a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Expedia"><b>Expedia</b></a> just announced <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2009-11-05-expedia-telephone-fees_N.htm?csp=34"><b>they're waiving their $20 fee</b></a> for the 7% of Americans who book their itineraries over the phone, establishing themselves in a niche and sticking a finger in the eyes of competitors. Airline centers mostly charge $5-$35 for telephone bookings&#151;Southwest is the only exception&#151;while <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Orbitz"><b>Orbitz</b></a> and <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Travelocity"><b>Travelocity</b></a> charge $25 per ticket. <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/tag/Orbitz"><b>Priceline</b></a> doesn't even offer that option. <p>This won't be much use to us, since our calls to booking agents are limited to rants about the impossibility of reserving rewards travel these days. But Expedia had already eliminated flight booking fees online, and it's nice to see anyone cutting any fee for any reason, no matter how marginal or symbolic the gesture:]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           </description>
<dc:creator>Omri</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-06T17:24:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/9/12/141958/015">
<title>U.S. to International Visitors: Gimme Ten Bucks</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/9/12/141958/015</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/16133/Ten_Bucks_2.jpg" class="top"> <p>Is a visit to the U.S. worth ten bucks? The U.S. Senate seems to think so. According to the <em>AP</em>, the Senate voted on Wednesday to charge a $10 fee to international visitors, with the proceeds funding a <b>nonprofit corporation to promote tourism</b> to the country. In order for the bill to become law, the House of Representatives would also have to approve it, but if they do, foreign visitors who do not need visas to enter the country would have to pay the fee each time they register online in advance of a trip. ]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 </description>
<dc:creator>Victor Ozols</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-12T14:19:58-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/7/2/123028/8894">
<title>Paris: When A Two-Minute Phone Call at The Airport Costs $50</title>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/7/2/123028/8894</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jaunted.com/files/1425/airporttelephones.jpg" class="top"><p> When we got our <b>June credit card statement</b> the other day, we discovered a mysterious charge for about $52. Upon further investigation with the help of the credit card company, we learned that the charge was for a phone call we&#146;d made from a pay phone at <a href="http://www.jaunted.com/story/2009/5/18/162333/996/travel/On+the+Road+Again:+How+to+Reach+Paris-Charles+de+Gaulle">Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris</a>&#133;in <b>April</b>. Thanks to some wonky phone battery issues, we&#146;d had to use one of those <b>phones that accepts credit cards</b> in order to leave a friend a voicemail that we&#146;d arrived. The call lasted under two minutes, and cost more than a good meal out.<br>]]>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              </description>
<dc:creator>EricRosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T16:24:16-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<textinput rdf:about="http://www.jaunted.com/search/">
<title>Search Jaunted</title>
<description>Search Jaunted</description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.jaunted.com/search/</link>
</textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
